|
|
Mind-Body
Medicine (Psychoneuroimmunology) |
| |
|
Introduction |
|
Mind-body medicine is an approach to healing that harnesses the power of
thoughts, beliefs, and emotions to affect health positively (Cassileth 1998).
The field includes a range of approaches and techniques including but not
limited to social support, cognitive and behavioral therapy, meditation, guided
imagery, spiritual and energetic healing, music therapy, and hypnosis (Luskin et
al. 2000). |
|
|
Historical Background |
|
The majority of ancient healing practices, such as Traditional Chinese
Medicine and Ayurveda, emphasize the important links between the mind and the
body (Cassileth 1998). Philosophical thought, though, from Plato to Descartes
has shaped the Western medical view that the mind and the body are separate and
distinct aspects of human beings (Evengård et al. 1999). The Age of
Enlightenment, which began in the 17th century, launched a cultural
shift toward valuing scientific evidence as the basis for medical theory; any
connection between mind and body were viewed as superstitious remnants of folk
medicine. Louis Pasteur's Germ Theory of Illness further solidified this
attitude and became the basis for Western scientific medicine. Germ theory
purports that microorganisms cause most forms of disease; illness resulting from
the mind was split off into the field of psychiatry (Castleman 1996). Advances
in the fields of microbiology, pathology, and molecular biology further
uncovered bacterial and genetic causes of disease, which left many old mind-body
hypotheses unsubstantiated by scientific evidence (Cassileth 1998).
In 1964, psychiatrist George Solomon observed that depression seemed to
exacerbate rheumatoid arthritis; this led him to investigate the impact of
emotions on immune function in general. He developed the new scientific field of
psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) to study the interactions of psychology, neurology,
and immunity. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, cardiologist Herbert Benson
began studying the effects of transcendental meditation on blood pressure and
coined the term "the relaxation response." However, Benson never established the
exact mechanism of action that constituted the apparent mind-body link
(Castleman 1996). Beginning in 1975, psychologist Robert Ader published studies
demonstrating that cognitive and emotional cues could affect immune response
(Ader and Cohen 1993). His research established PNI as a legitimate medical
specialty (Castleman 1996). In the past few decades, research has uncovered
important connections between the mind and the body, renewing interest in the
applications of some age-old traditions, such as yoga and meditation. Today, the
field of PNI has helped establish behavioral medicine programs at prestigious
medical centers in the United States and around the world (Cassileth
1998). |
|
|
Scientific
Principles |
|
Stress is believed to activate the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical axis
(Evengård et al. 1999), leading to the release of stress hormones, which affect
nearly every organ and system in the body. For instance, stress related to
hostility can induce an imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic
nervous system activity, and adversely affect cardiovascular, endocrine, and
neuroendocrine function (Niaura et al. 2000). In addition, anxiety may affect
immune function as reflected in changes in levels of immune markers including
IFN-gamma and IL-4 in the blood, and decreases in natural killer (NK) cell
activity (Hashiro and Okumura 1998). Conversely, negative emotions, such as
anger and cynical hostility, have also been shown to increase NK activity
(Miller et al. 1999); either direction of change may cause a potential
disruption in normal immune function. Stress is often associated with immune
downregulation, thereby decreasing the production of interleukin-1 beta
messenger RNA (Marucha et al. 1998) and reducing the number of T helper cells
(Brosschot et al. 1998). Distress and depression may be linked to defective
repair of damaged DNA (Kiecolt-Glaser and Glaser 1999). Furthermore,
neuropeptides are thought to be the biochemical mediators of emotion; since
neuropeptides and their receptors are found throughout the immune system as well
as in the CNS, the network of neuropeptides and their receptors is believed to
constitute a neurohormonal communication system that helps regulate immune
function (Pert et al. 1998). Research suggests that emotional expression that
encourages disclosure and active coping creates balance in the
neuropeptide-receptor network, and thus stabilizes the immune system (Pert et
al. 1998). These factors demonstrate that the brain, immune system, and
endocrine system are an integrated information circuit; a change in one
necessarily affects the others (Evengård et al. 1999). |
|
|
Mechanism of Action |
|
Mind-body medical practices are intended, through a variety of methods, to
activate the relaxation response and stabilize the stress response. A relaxed
state improves physiological function by reducing the release of stress hormones
from the neuroendocrine system and by enhancing immune function (Castleman
1996). The connection between stress hormones and immune function is further
supported by in vitro research, which indicates that norepinephrine and
epinephrine accelerate the growth of the gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Although the relevance of this
research to human health remains to be established, the study at least suggests
a new perspective on the role of stress in the development of infections (Belay
2000). Similarly, distress and depression in cancer patients are associated with
defective repair of damaged DNA and alterations in programmed cell death
(apoptosis); the evidence suggests that psychological interventions, such as
support groups, may ultimately benefit cellular function in such patients.
Increased social connection may thus be a key psychological mediator of the
positive health benefits of PNI (Kiecolt-Glaser and Glaser 1999). As a
consequence of stress reduction and the inducement of relaxation, mind-body
medicine may positively influence a patient's quality of life as well as the
course of many different disease processes, including hypertension, asthma,
coronary heart disease, obesity, cancer, and myocardial ischemia. See the
section entitled Clinical Applications for further discussion.
|
|
|
Clinical Evaluation |
|
Mind-body medicine includes a wide variety of conventional and alternative
modalities; the clinical evaluation, therefore, is dependant on the particular
treatment sought. For more information on clinical evaluation of alternative
approaches related to mind-body medicine, please see the monographs on specific
therapies such as Relaxation, Spirituality, Hypnotherapy, and
Biofeedback. |
|
|
Clinical Applications |
|
A review of complementary therapies for acute pain indicates that mind-body
techniques, such as cognitive and behavioral therapy, relaxation and breathing
methods, TENS, and biofeedback, may be beneficial adjuncts to pharmacological
treatments for acute pain. It is suggested that such methods provide
distraction, enhance relaxation, increase coping skills, reduce tension and
pain, and decrease the need for medication (Rusy and Weisman 2000). A
meta-analysis of mind-body techniques, including cognitive-behavioral treatment,
relaxation, hypnosis, and biofeedback, suggests that they may be effective in
moderating loudness, annoyance, negative affect, and sleep disturbances related
to tinnitus. Cognitive-behavioral treatment seems to be specifically effective
in inducing the longest lasting effects on tinnitus annoyance (Andersson and
Lyttkens 1999). Furthermore, research suggests that better coping skills and the
perceived control over symptoms can improve the course of gastrointestinal
diseases, including dyspepsia, constipation, diarrhea, irritable bowel syndrome,
acid reflux disease, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease (Drossman et al.
2000).
Researchers postulate that cognitive-behavioral therapy may be effective in
moderating symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). This condition seems to
deregulate immune function, as CFS has been correlated with a decreased ratio of
CD4+/CD8+ T cells and a depressed function of natural killer cells. In addition,
MRI studies indicate areas of potential inflammation and/or demyelination in the
subcortical regions of the brain in patients with CFS, suggesting pathology of
the central nervous system. Because of the relationship between CFS and altered
immune and nervous system function, some researchers believe that the complex
origin of the disease is best understood and treated within the framework of
mind-body medicine (Evengård et al. 1999).
Research suggests that a stressed state and negative emotions have an adverse
impact on health. On the basis of available scientific evidence, one may
conclude that mind-body interventions may be beneficial in conditions including,
but not limited to, hypertension (HTN), cancer, asthma, and coronary artery
disease (CAD). Many mind-body techniques are also used to treat symptoms of
anxiety and depression. One report indicates that unconscious defensive or
repressive coping mechanisms are associated with serious medical consequences
such as HTN (Mann 2000). Another study identifies a significant relationship
between hopelessness and HTN (Everson et al. 2000). Still another demonstrates
that helplessness and hopelessness may be linked to a significantly reduced
survival rate in patients with breast cancer (Watson et al. 1999). Emotional
factors also play a role in asthma patients' perception of their illness; in one
study, anxiety was correlated with a greater subjective assessment of
bronchoconstriction compared to objective measurements (Affleck et al. 2000).
Hostility in particular is correlated with a range of negative health
effects. Clinical trials show that hostile attitudes may reduce cardiac output
and increase diastolic blood pressure and total peripheral vascular resistance
during episodes of social stress, thereby creating a greater risk for coronary
heart disease (Davis et al. 2000). Hostility is also associated with obesity,
central adiposity, insulin resistance, body mass index, elevated serum
triglycerides, and decreased HDL cholesterol (Niaura et al. 2000). In addition,
hostility, anger, and stress-induced exhaustion are correlated with increased
blood clotting, hemodynamic reactivity, and inflammation, and may lead to
increased risks of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease (Kop 1999).
|
|
|
Risks, Side Effects, Adverse
Events |
|
Mind-body medicine may unintentionally create the notion that patients are
responsible for their illnesses because they lack the proper mental attitude;
aside from being scientifically inaccurate, such blame can induce feelings of
distress and guilt (Castleman 1996). Some experts believe that mind-body
medicine may be most effective when combined with other therapies. In addition,
there may be risks, side effects, and adverse events associated with each
individual modality within the field of mind-body medicine. Please see the
monographs on specific therapies such as Relaxation, Spirituality, Hypnotherapy,
and Biofeedback for further information. |
|
|
Contraindications |
|
Similarly, contraindications depend on the type of modality being used.
Please see the monographs on specific therapies related to mind-body medicine
such as Relaxation, Spirituality, Hypnotherapy, and Biofeedback for further
information. |
|
|
Additional Clinical
Outcomes |
|
Psychosocial interventions show particular promise for HIV patients (Robinson
et al. 2000), cancer patients (Kiecolt-Glaser and Glaser 1999), and women at
risk for pre-term delivery (Ruiz and Pearson 1999). Assessing psychosocial risk
factors in the etiology of disease (i.e., CAD) may provide a useful guide for
the development of such intervention strategies (Kop 1999). In addition, the
correlation between helplessness/hopelessness and survival rate in breast cancer
patients reinforces the need to provide adequate psychological care for oncology
patients (Watson et al. 1999). |
|
|
The Future |
|
Future studies should examine the role of psychological intervention, such as
cognitive-behavioral treatment, in improving coping skills and perceived
self-control and their effect on the clinical outcome of many disorders,
including but not limited to gastrointestinal disorders (Drossman et al. 2000).
Furthermore, the potential cost-effectiveness and lack of side effects
associated with mind-body therapies make continued research an important
priority (Luskin et al. 2000).
Recently, the National Institutes for Health (NIH. 2000) received $10 million
to conduct research in the behavioral sciences and establish pilot mind-body
medical centers (NIH. 2000). In particular, more research is needed to identify
the precise neuroendocrine and central nervous system mechanisms that underlie
the mind-body connection (Everson et al. 2000). Future research should also
identify the specific modalities that are most likely to improve health status,
as well as target interventions for depressed and hopeless patients (Tucker
1999). |
|
|
Training, Certification, and
Licensing
Requirements |
|
Mind-body techniques comprise a wide variety of modalities and each one has
its own training, certification, and licensing procedures. |
|
|
Resources |
|
For more information on mind-body medicine, please see the monographs on
specific therapies that may be related to mind-body medicine, such as
Relaxation, Spirituality, Hypnotherapy, and Biofeedback. In addition, the
Mind/Body Health Newsletter is a scientifically referenced quarterly
newsletter published by the Center for Health Sciences at the Institute for the
Study of Human Knowledge. Subscriptions can be ordered from ISHK Book Service,
P.O. Box 381062, Cambridge, MA 02238-1062, at 800-222-4745. |
|
|
References |
|
Ader R, Cohen N. Psychoneuroimmunology: conditioning and stress. Annu Rev
Psychol. 1993;44:53-85.
Affleck G, Apter A, Tennen H, et al. Mood states associated with transitory
changes in asthma symptoms and peak expiratory flow. Psychosom Med.
2000;62(1):61-68.
Andersson G, Lyttkens L. A meta-analytic review of psychological treatments
for tinnitus. Br J Audiol. 1999;33(4):201-210.
Belay T. Stress may encourage growth of disease-causing bacteria. Paper
presented at: General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology; May 24,
2000; Los Angeles, Calif.
Brosschot JF, Godaert GL, Benschop RJ, Olff M, Ballieux RE, Heijnen CJ.
Experimental stress and immunological reactivity: a closer look at perceived
uncontrollability. Psychosom Med. 1998;60(3):359-361.
Cassileth BR. The Alternative Medicine Handbook: The Complete Reference
Guide to Alternative and Complementary Therapies. New York: W.W. Norton
& Company; 1998.
Castleman M. Nature's Cures. Emmaus, Pa: Rodale Press, Inc.; 1996.
Davis MC, Matthews KA, McGrath CE. Hostile attitudes predict elevated
vascular resistance during interpersonal stress in men and women. Psychosom
Med. 2000;62(1):17-25.
Drossman DA, Leserman J, Li Z, Keefe F, Hu YJ, Toomey TC. Effects of coping
on health outcome among women with gastrointestinal disorders. Psychosom
Med. 2000;62(3):309-317.
Evengård B, Schacterle RS, Komaroff AL. Chronic fatigue syndrome: new
insights and old ignorance. J Intern Med. 1999;246(5):455-469.
Everson SA, Kaplan GA, Goldberg DE, Salonen JT. Hypertension incidence is
predicted by high levels of hopelessness in Finnish men. Hypertension.
2000;35(2):561-567.
Hashiro M, Okumura M. The relationship between the psychological and
immunological state in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci.
1998;16(3):231-235.
Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. Psychoneuroimmunology and cancer: fact or
fiction? Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(11):1603-1607.
Kop WJ. Chronic and acute psychological risk factors for clinical
manifestations of coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med.
1999;61(4):476-487.
Luskin FM, Newell KA, Griffith M, et al. A review of mind/body therapies in
the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders with implications for the elderly.
Altern Ther Health Med. 2000;6(2):46-56.
Mann SJ. The mind/body link in essential hypertension: time for a new
paradigm. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000;6(2):39-45.
Marucha PT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Favagehi M. Mucosal wound healing is impaired
by examination stress. Psychosom Med. 1998;60(3):362-365.
Miller GE, Dopp JM, Myers HF, Stevens SY, Fahey JL. Psychological predictors
of natural killer cell mobilization during marital conflict. Health
Psychol. 1999;18(3):262-271.
Niaura R, Banks SM, Ward KD, et al. Hostility and metabolic syndrome in older
males: the normative aging study. Psychosom Med. 2000;62:7-16.
NIH. NIH establishes five mind-body research centers [press release].
Accessed August 2, 2000 at www.nih.gov/news/pr/sept99/od-30.htm
.
Pert CB, Dreher HE, Ruff MR. The psychosomatic network: foundations of
mind/body-medicine. Altern Ther Health Med. 1998;4(4):30-41.
Robinson FP, Mathews HL, Witek-Janusek L. Stress reduction and HIV disease: a
review of intervention studies using a psychoneuroimmunology framework. J
Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2000;11(2):87-96.
Ruiz RJ, Pearson AJ. Psychoneuroimmunology and preterm birth. A holistic
model for obstetrical nursing practice and research. MCN Am J Matern Child
Nurs. 1999;24(5):230-235.
Rusy LM, Weisman SJ. Complementary therapies for acute pediatric pain
management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000;47(3):589-599.
Tucker JB. Modification of attitudes to influence survival from breast
cancer. Lancet. 1999;354(9187):1320.
Watson M, Haviland JS, Greer S, Davidson J, Bliss JM. Influence of
psychological response on survival in breast cancer: a population-based cohort
study. Lancet.
1999;354(9187):1331-1336. |
|
Copyright © 2000 Integrative Medicine
Communications This publication contains
information relating to general principles
of medical care that should not in any event be construed as specific
instructions for individual patients. The publisher does not accept any
responsibility for the accuracy of the information or the consequences arising
from the application, use, or misuse of any of the information contained herein,
including any injury and/or damage to any person or property as a matter of
product liability, negligence, or otherwise. No warranty, expressed or implied,
is made in regard to the contents of this material. No claims or endorsements
are made for any drugs or compounds currently marketed or in investigative use.
The reader is advised to check product information (including package inserts)
for changes and new information regarding dosage, precautions, warnings,
interactions, and contraindications before administering any drug, herb, or
supplement discussed herein. | |